<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Use FriendFeed to Enhance &amp; Organize Twitter Chats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/</link>
	<description>Hacking Healthcare: Online &#38; Everywhere Else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:18:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jim.

It&#039;s not a perfect solution (I don&#039;t think there is one). But at least it&#039;s a way to set up a cafe for specific topics/threads that can&#039;t be explored well in Twitter. Twitter&#039;s great for ambient intimacy, but not so much for lenghthy conversation. 

I actually shot it with Jing (screencast) but had problems with sizing the embed code. I used ScreenToast - easy and simple to use. As I do more of these, I&#039;ll have to invest in something more heavy duty. Thanks for the recommendations.

PHil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a perfect solution (I don&#8217;t think there is one). But at least it&#8217;s a way to set up a cafe for specific topics/threads that can&#8217;t be explored well in Twitter. Twitter&#8217;s great for ambient intimacy, but not so much for lenghthy conversation. </p>
<p>I actually shot it with Jing (screencast) but had problems with sizing the embed code. I used ScreenToast &#8211; easy and simple to use. As I do more of these, I&#8217;ll have to invest in something more heavy duty. Thanks for the recommendations.</p>
<p>PHil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medXcentral</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>medXcentral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Phil... as always... you&#039;re on the cutting edge. The method you&#039;ve demonstrated may, on the one hand, fragment the conversation between two services, yet, on the other hand, actually doubles the conversation by leveraging two communities. Nice.  And, on friendfeed, the conversation seems to remain in string format (all replies to a topic tied under the original post.) 

Can&#039;t wait to collaborate with you further re: FriendFeed and it&#039;s application for all of health care...especially the general workforce population.  There&#039;s a lot of voices not being heard because they do not know how and are likely intimidated by the learning curve.

Also, nice work on your screencast. Two other tools to consider for screencasting:

My favorite: http://jingproject.com - (by TechSmith..makers of Camtasia Studio)..  free, very robust, free hosting with playlists, screen capture built in, etc. (pro version, very inexpensive, auto push to YouTube for vids and flickr for screen shots. Very cool. And, no, I am not paid to say that. :)

Another is http://screencast-o-matic.com/ .. worth a look. I&#039;d consider it under-rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil&#8230; as always&#8230; you&#8217;re on the cutting edge. The method you&#8217;ve demonstrated may, on the one hand, fragment the conversation between two services, yet, on the other hand, actually doubles the conversation by leveraging two communities. Nice.  And, on friendfeed, the conversation seems to remain in string format (all replies to a topic tied under the original post.) </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to collaborate with you further re: FriendFeed and it&#8217;s application for all of health care&#8230;especially the general workforce population.  There&#8217;s a lot of voices not being heard because they do not know how and are likely intimidated by the learning curve.</p>
<p>Also, nice work on your screencast. Two other tools to consider for screencasting:</p>
<p>My favorite: <a href="http://jingproject.com" rel="nofollow">http://jingproject.com</a> &#8211; (by TechSmith..makers of Camtasia Studio)..  free, very robust, free hosting with playlists, screen capture built in, etc. (pro version, very inexpensive, auto push to YouTube for vids and flickr for screen shots. Very cool. And, no, I am not paid to say that. <img src='http://www.nursehacker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Another is <a href="http://screencast-o-matic.com/" rel="nofollow">http://screencast-o-matic.com/</a> .. worth a look. I&#8217;d consider it under-rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Nick -

Thanks. As FF add more features, especially to its search, the options for extending the conversations will expand. 

Whether FF is here in few years or not, it&#039;s the social interface that will probably be around. 

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick -</p>
<p>Thanks. As FF add more features, especially to its search, the options for extending the conversations will expand. </p>
<p>Whether FF is here in few years or not, it&#8217;s the social interface that will probably be around. </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-4</guid>
		<description>@Tom

Great questions.

No, not all users need a FF account - the point here is to offer the *option* to those who have accounts to extend the conversations and help to organzie them into topics. If everybody had FF accounts, the entire chat could just be held on FF :)

You can import a Search.Twitter feed for the hashtag (in fact I&#039;ve done it for:

 #hcmktg - http://friendfeed.com/hcmktg-on-friendfeed  

#hcsm - http://friendfeed.com/hcsm-friendfeed

Currently, I don&#039;t think FF supports time period search. That would extend how to organize even farther. I&#039;ll see if I can crowdsource that question. 

Here&#039;s the point:

We&#039;re not looking for a substitute to Twitter for these chats - only an enhancement and a way to bring *some* order.

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom</p>
<p>Great questions.</p>
<p>No, not all users need a FF account &#8211; the point here is to offer the *option* to those who have accounts to extend the conversations and help to organzie them into topics. If everybody had FF accounts, the entire chat could just be held on FF <img src='http://www.nursehacker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You can import a Search.Twitter feed for the hashtag (in fact I&#8217;ve done it for:</p>
<p> #hcmktg &#8211; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/hcmktg-on-friendfeed" rel="nofollow">http://friendfeed.com/hcmktg-on-friendfeed</a>  </p>
<p>#hcsm &#8211; <a href="http://friendfeed.com/hcsm-friendfeed" rel="nofollow">http://friendfeed.com/hcsm-friendfeed</a></p>
<p>Currently, I don&#8217;t think FF supports time period search. That would extend how to organize even farther. I&#8217;ll see if I can crowdsource that question. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the point:</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not looking for a substitute to Twitter for these chats &#8211; only an enhancement and a way to bring *some* order.</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Great video - seems like a very comfortable way to work the power of freendfeed into the familiarity of twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video &#8211; seems like a very comfortable way to work the power of freendfeed into the familiarity of twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Stitt</title>
		<link>http://www.nursehacker.com/2009/07/27/how-to-use-friendfeed-to-enhance-organize-twitter-chats/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Stitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nursehacker.com/?p=27#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Nice presentation. Sparked some thinking for me.

To capture the entire tweet stream for a Tweetchat using FriendFeed, wouldn&#039;t the participants in the chat all need to have a FriendFeed account (or, minmally have FF accts linked bi-directionally to their Twitter accounts if they chose to participate via Twitter?)

Also, do you think FriendFeed could handle the velocity of a #hcsm or a #journchat, both of which often operate at 1 tweet every 6 seconds (average) to more than 1 tweet every 3 seconds for popular topics?

Any ideas on how long FriendFeed maintains search archives? I saw the link/embed options but those are tied to a FF database. Are there export options where one can export a hashtag conversation for a specific time range/date?

Cheers,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Nice presentation. Sparked some thinking for me.</p>
<p>To capture the entire tweet stream for a Tweetchat using FriendFeed, wouldn&#8217;t the participants in the chat all need to have a FriendFeed account (or, minmally have FF accts linked bi-directionally to their Twitter accounts if they chose to participate via Twitter?)</p>
<p>Also, do you think FriendFeed could handle the velocity of a #hcsm or a #journchat, both of which often operate at 1 tweet every 6 seconds (average) to more than 1 tweet every 3 seconds for popular topics?</p>
<p>Any ideas on how long FriendFeed maintains search archives? I saw the link/embed options but those are tied to a FF database. Are there export options where one can export a hashtag conversation for a specific time range/date?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
